|
School Bond Issue
More Questions Than Answers
|
 |
The Tuesday meeting of the Ontonagon Township Board
generated more visitors interested in the O.A.S.D. Bond
Proposal than the Township business at hand. The township
board did discuss the matter of repairing the front steps to
the building and it was learned that no one had submitted a
bid on the project. A motion was made, supported and passed
to extend the bid process one month and an advertisement
would be placed in the local newspaper.
At the beginning of the meeting it was announced that this
would be a regular township meeting and was "not a public
hearing on the bond proposal."
Legally this was of course correct, however, a public
hearing it was indeed. That's what everyone was there for
and that's what everyone got. The regular meeting was
formally and promptly, closed.
The floor was turned over to Matt Lukshaitus and Gray
Webber, who spent the rest of the evening presenting the
reasons for the Bond Proposal. First they described the bond
committee as a cross section of the community. They didn't
explain however, how school personnel were systematically
excluded from "the committee" Mr. Lukshaitus, went into the
need for a new roof on the High School which lead into
something else and something else and something else. In the
final analysis a $500,000 roof had turned into a $3,000,000.
renovation of the entire district. Mr. Webber went into
quite a bit of details and explained how the continuing
decrease in student population required an addition to the
jr./high school building. This year the number of students
was down by 24 and only 500 are expected next year. For some
inexplicable reason the Webber Cartel decided on an addition
for 505 students instead of the 465 and 425 student
estimates also given. Mr. Lukshaitus stated that just fixing
the roof would not solve the dilemma of decreasing
enrollment. When he was asked "how does the addition solve
the problem of decreasing enrollment?" for the first time
that evening both Lukshaitus and Webber were at a loss for
words.
Anne Kingscott and Bruce Johanson asked a myriad of
questions pertaining to the history of poor upkeep on the
buildings that are still being paid for by Ontonagon
Taxpayers. They questioned the wisdom of presenting a new
tax proposal before the old bond is paid up. It is quite
clear that those in attendance were concerned with the rise
in food and energy prices. They don't think that this is the
time to further tax those already living with pinched
budgets. Others voiced concern that the new annex did not
provide room for Head Start or Special Needs students. Head
Start currently pays the district $2500. per month rent.
The Trio which included Paula Domitrovich zigged and zagged
all evening as if they were in a game of dodge ball. One
thing was certain they didn't want to hear at all from
former School Superintendent Larry Ford, who was left
standing unnoticed for what seemed an eternity. When he was
finally recognized the write-in candidate for the school
board unloaded on the failure of the committee and the
school board for the district's current surplus situation.
Ford accused them of failing to provide leadership by
reducing teaching staff and programs while remaining
unjustifiably top heavy in administration. He too condemned
the administration and past administrations for not properly
caring for the buildings entrusted to them.
The school superintendent stated that if passed, the
additional tax on his home would only be $60. per year. A
member of the audience then asked "what is the median income
of the district?"
For the second time in the evening Mr. Lukshaitus was lost
for an answer. He clearly did not know that the average
income in the area was only one fifth of his salary. He was
then told while $60. was no big deal to him, it might be
monumental to someone living on a small already inadequate
income! Once again, Mr. Lukshaitus was speechless.
One amazing thing was said at this meeting by the
perpetrators of the bond proposal and that was no one knows
what the tax money will pay for as the building plans shown
to the community are not fixed in stone. In other words "the
committee" is asking the taxpayers to agree on paying for a
totally unknown quantity like buying a pig in poke.
At the end of the evening taxpayers left the meeting with
more questions than answers.
|
|
|
|