Ontonagon - November 19, 2009 Last evening 32
Ontonagon County residents came together for the
second time in two weeks to discuss ways to improve
the economic future of the county.
The meeting was once again led by Frank Wardynski
the MSU County Extension Agent. At the last meeting
an action committee was formed to set the direction
of the venture, including the hiring of a Community
Development Director and ways to fund the
enterprise.
The first item discussed was to name the project
and define its mission.
Ontonagon County Economic Partnership Team was
chosen for the project. The mission of the project
is to provide leadership towards starting actions
that promote and develop Ontonagon county as a
thriving and diverse economic community.
The five person action committee decided that the
person that they would seek would be someone who be
a take charge individual, and one that would knock
on doors and do whatever it takes to bring
businesses and jobs to the county.
The group developed a job description for the
Developer position and reviewed the available
avenues that could be used to raise the needed money
to both seed the project and sustain the project for
at least five years.
The committee members went on the Internet to
review what other communities similar to Ontonagon
were looking for in a Community Development
Director. They took pieces of several descriptions
and pasted them together.
They group decided on the title as the Ontonagon
County Economic and Community Development Director.
As for funding the group is looking to form a
private LLC as one method of raising the funding. It
is believed that private investment would be a
faster method of capitalizing the Partnership.
Another suggestion was that each township,
village and other county entities could contribute a
percentage of their budgets to create the funding.
The reasoning being that the partnership would
eliminate many of the countywide EDC’s and Planning
Committees.
Development and installation of programs
It was stated that the project would require
about $350,000 per year and that it might require a
combination of private and public funding. It was
pointed out that the EDC could hire the Director in
lieu of an executive secretary. The county which
provides the housing for the EDC could do so for the
Partnership. That many of the public and private
entities interested in supporting the project could
make donations in material and services in lieu of
cash. At the previous meeting Norm Pestka offered to
provide the first $20,000 for the project.
There were those at the meeting that thought that
it would be difficult to have private investment
year after year to sustain the project. Others
believed that the local municipalities were already
being squeezed with the reduction of local revenue
sharing.
It was felt that one of the first things that needed
was to put together booklet of community assets,
profiling each community in the county. The
Community Development Director could provide the
booklet to prospective business owners and when one
showed interest the Director would work closely with
the business owner of management.
Jay Brogan, a former Ontonagon resident, spoke to
the group about a similar project in Munising where
he now resides. He works for and is on the Board of
Hiawatha Communications, which owns Ontonagon
Telephone Company.
He told the audience that a similar project was
undertaken in Munising a few years ago. He stated
that the project was funded by several of the area’s
Tourism Bureaus. They hired a Director who did bring
some timber and timber related businesses to the area.
The director that they hired had political
connections which Brogan felt was a must. The person
they hired had to leave the area for personal
reasons, but everyone was satisfied with what he had
accomplished. Brogan told the group that Munising
was still struggling, but nothing like that of
Ontonagon. Brogan thinks Ontonagon is headed in the
right direction and suggested that the committees
contact the telephone company for advice when they
felt it was necessary.
More Action committees .
It was decided that more committees needed to
make the plan work. Six or Seven new committees were
formed last night with many volunteers signing on.
|