More Recent Stories

Return To Main Page

Recent Stories

Traffic Controls Subject of Debate

Bessemer - November 3, 2009

Members of the Bessemer City Council said goodbye to councilmen Carpenedo and Peterson at the close of last nights council meeting. Both councilmen have chosen not to seek reelection in today’s elections. Mayor John Frillo presented the the two councilmen with plaques of appreciation by the city for their service to the community.

The council tabled a vote of a variance request by Mr Harju. Harju wants to get a use variance for a snowmobile park on his forty plus acreage. In the past Harju has operated the park on a very limited basis. His request for a permanent variance brought swift action by neighbors who do not want the park so close to their homes, citing noise and traffic in their petition presented to the council.

A neighbor, Greg Miller was at the meeting. He told the council that the neighbors were not necessarily opposed to the park being operated as it had been in the past. Their concern was with a permanent variance and what might develop from it.

The council voted to postpone action pending a public hearing.

The council took action on the U.S. 2 traffic situation. Members of the council are not satisfied with the signage along the highway. The number one culprit is the Tacconelli Sign which obscures the 30mph sign from eastbound motorist . Councilmen Matonich believes that signs could and should be better placed along the roadway.

The only disagreement on the matter results from the impotency of MDOT officials to do anything about the matter. They cite the fact that in order to move a sign just one inch an entire traffic survey must be completed by the State Police. The irony in this is that the the survey could actually result in the speed limit being increased. It was the probability of that happening that caused the signage request to be voted down at last night’s meeting.

Editor’s Note: There is something very wrong with this entire situation. One minute we’re told that there are no longer enough State Police Officers to inspect our school buses. The next minute we’re told MDOT cannot make a highway signage decision without the State Police stopping their vital work in order to do a traffic survey. We’re told by MDOT that there isn’t enough dead bodies on US 2 to justify a traffic light at the Walmart intersection. Not enough money or injuries to justify the expense of one stinking traffic light and yet the same cast of characters can give away million dollar communication towers so that they build new multi-million dollar towers. That’s a great big HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!

 

 
Township Trustees Rebuff Simmons
Ironwood Township - October 30, 2009

The Township Board of Trustees confirmed their confidence in Township Supervisor Kim Mattson. In a unanimous vote the Trustees elected Mattson to  represent the Trustees on a joint conference committee with members of the Planning and Zoning Committee. The committee was formed to finalize the INFAMOUS SOIL ORDINANCE.

Jim Simmons is spending money as if it were water in his sexist vendetta against Kim Mattson.

Unfortuately, Simmons is spending Township money in the process. Township Taxpayers will pick up the tab for the special election created by Simmons and his band of semi-illiterate followers.

We now know why the Globe was so willing to print his smear letters. He has placed a full page in the Globe. It appears that Advertising revenue drives the Globe editorial and Opinion page. Sounds just like the Unfriendly Friend$ of the Carnegie doesn't it?

Meantime Mattson has sent out fliers of her own:

Vote "No" To The Recall on November 3

On November 3, each voter in Ironwood Township will be faced with six ballot questions. The third question on the ballot is:

Shall Kim M. Mattson be recalled from the office of Ironwood Township Supervisor?

Please vote No.

I have been with the Ironwood Township since July, 2000. Before working at the Township, I worked at MFC First National Bank for eight years. Previous to that, while attending college, I worked at Sun-N-Snow Café. I obtained my Associates Degree from G.C.C. and my Bachelors Degree in Business-Accounting from the University of Phoenix. I am also a Level 1 Assessor.

Being elected to the position of Supervisor in 2008 was an honor. I take the office seriously, listening to concerns and helping with problems.

I was born and raised in the Township, on Slade Road. I continue the tradition by raising my children, Troy and Jamee, in the Township too. My Father, Kenneth (Bim) was a local mechanic and my Mother, Nancy worked in banking and real estate. I have many local ties here and aim to live up to their aspirations.

I am a member of the GRWA (Gogebic Range Water Authority) Board, the GRWA Executive Board, the GIWA (Gogebic Iron Wastewater Authority) Board, the PAUD (Powderhorn Area Utility District) Board, Parks and Recreation Committee, the Strengthening Your Niche group, the Ironwood PTO, and am President of the Barracuda Swim Team Parents Board.

In order for the recall to have made it to the ballot, a petition was circulated. While it was circulating, many people were given misinformation about me. Again, I was born and raised here. Having my reputation tarnished by this misinformation has been very difficult. The misinformation on the petition pertains to wages, meetings, petitions, and pensions.

The following is clarification on the misinformation:

  • The Charter Township of Ironwood Board of Trustees consists of seven members-each of whom have equal votes. I was not seated in office when the first draft budget was presented. The seven-member board makes the decisions on the proposed budget. As Supervisor, I received a 0% increase from my predecessor. The Clerk and Treasurer received a 3% increase.
  • Meeting notices are posted as required by the Open Meetings Act, and are a statutory duty of the Clerk.
  • Union negotiation contracts are not discussed in open meetings until the contracts are approved.
  • Management was contacted to see if they were aware of a petition circulating there.
  • Timely responses are given to all Freedom of Information Act requests according to Michigan law. Requests are answered exactly as received.

Thank you to all for your continued support. Please contact me if you have any questions.

Authorized and Paid for By the Committee to elect Kim Mattson, N10676 Lake Road, Ironwood, MI 49938

 
 

Rick Semo: "Not Until It's Ours!"

Recently on one of Semo's tours of the Caves the group came across junk left there by some poor mannered people. One of the tourists asked "shouldn't we pick this up?"

Semo replied "Not until this place is ours!" 

Ooops, I thought it belongs to the taxpayers and all the residents. We guess the perpetrator of the littering wasn't the only one with bad manners!

This  story was told to us by several people on that tour. Mr. Semo has shown such characteristics before. During the election for the K-6 Bond Issue, Mr. Semo stopped Arlene Szott who was on her way into the Gymnorium to speak on a different point of view than that of Semo's. He made sure that he was so rude that Arlene was shaken up and unable to address the voters in the gym. Semo, later called to apologize for his obnoxious behavior.

Semo has made it very clear that he wants no motorized vehicles in the Caves. So has Gemma Lamb, Bob Burchell and Ron Taylor. The problem we have with this is that the Proposed Miners Memorial Park is a sham. A coverup to hide the real motives of these hiker/biker groups. That is to 1) kick the ATV and Snowmobiles out of the Caves and 2) to kick the Snowmobiles and ATV's off of Trail 2 and, 3) Kick the ATVs and Snowmobiles off the City Streets.

This is what the MMP wants. That is what they consider their "Comprehensive Recreational Vehicle Master Plan"

We believe that the Caves area is large enough to accommodate both  motorized and non-motorized sports.

We believe that Ironwood cannot afford to choose one or the other.

We believe that a Miner's Memorial Park is an OK idea. But, we believe that it should be developed by honest people with honest motives.

I do not ride ATVs nor do I Ride snowmobiles. I have in the last two months invested in a new mountain bike and a new set of snow shoes. I look forward to using them in the caves area.

But, I do not look forward to evicting snowmobiles or atv's for my own Greedy purposes. Ironwood cannot afford to choose one or the other.

Unfortunately, some of the people involved in the division have monetary considerations that are clouding their judgment.

pictured above scouts and snowmobilers sharing a trail. There was never anyone in another's way. Intelligence not seen in this election is all that is needed to make it work.
 

Library Renovation Tax

Number 1

Ironwood Issue

Ironwood - November 2, 2009

It seems as might be expected at Election time, things start getting muddy as to who said what and who did what. Politicians are known to have selective memory and of course those with a financial stake in the election outcome also have selective memories.

There are those who would lead you to believe that the Caves is not an issue in this election. Well it is an issue. It is an issue that goes straight to the character of the candidates. Some candidate such as Burchell and Gemma Lamb, Semo and Taylor are into this issue right up their eyeballs. Taylor and Semo are outspoken opponents of ATV’s and Snowmobiles. Taylor at a public hearing stated that he moved to Ironwood because it didn’t allow snowmobiles on the streets. His partners in crime say they want a Comprehensive Plan for Recreational Vehicles. They, Lamb and Burchell have voted against allowing snowmobiles on selective streets. They also voted against having Trail number 2. They don’t want ATV’s or Snowmobiles in the caves.

Which begs the question. Just where the heck do they want these motorized recreational vehicles? Obviously anywhere except Ironwood. What bothers me most is that Semo, Burchell, Lamb and Taylor all lack the courage of their convictions and will not state honestly just what their position is on the Caves.

 
pictured above Rick Semo pictured above Ron Taylor

Both candidates have extreme anti snowmobile and ATV sentiments

Have you ever seen the movie "Best Little Whorehouse in Texas"? In it there’s a scene where reporters are asking the Governor, played by Charles Durning, about the whorehouse. In reply, the Governor goes into a song and dance routine called "The Side Step" dancing and singing all over the steps to the capital building. He never uttered one syllable that remotely resembled an answer.

Listening to Burchell, Lamb, Semo and Taylor, I get the feeling that I am watching the Governor on rerun. Over and over and over ad nauseum.

You too can view the video by clicking below.

 

See the Side Step. Click above. If you've attended any city council meetings in the last four years you will really appreciate this one!

 
The Miner’s Memorial Heritage Park concept was adapted long after it was decided to kick motorized sports out of the Caves. There was no MMHP until the trail plan stumbled when the trail advocates used their positions on the P&Z and Trail Committee to block Jerry Pisani from building warehouses on the corner of Ayer and Bonnie. They claimed they needed the 4+ acres for their trail to pass through. HMMMM!

After public opinion opposed the loss of the tax revenue, Burchell, Semo and Lamb set out in a new direction. Let’s call the trails something people will be afraid to talk out against. Oh, let’s call it a heritage trail. Well it has worked to some extent, but not entirely. Trail interest has waned. Recent tours of the caves have produced less than half the number of hikers as earlier in the year. Even a tour to the Pabst Mine on the anniversary of the Mine Disaster was a dismal failure. If local residents don’t care why would anyone else care. This alleged memorial has already cost the Ironwood taxpayers and will cost them a great deal more if the wrong people are elected to the city council. Read Previous Article 11/08

HOVEY - A LOT TO CHEW ON!
Hovey, now there’s a hot topic. First some background. While some people sat around whining about the Hovey project, IronwoodInfo reporters Arvo Toolanen and Lou Bonagura started the anti-Hovey ball rolling. They (we) wrote more than 200 letters to government officials in Lansing. We wrote every state representative and state senator in Lansing. Wow, was that a learning experience. We even wrote to the State Police and State Board of Education, explaining how Hovey was jeopardizing their funding.

We hit pay dirt on the second mailing when we pointed out how MSHDA had been greasing the skids for the downstate speculators. We pointed to all the surveys showing the foul land, we pointed out how a DEQ survey on wet lands issues had been waived etc., etc. etc. We didn’t sit on our hands nor did we just write letters, or editorials. We at IronwoodInfo put our money where our mouths were.

We paid for information obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. Much of that information is now in the hands of the attorneys fighting the Hovey debacle.


What we did accomplish was this, we at IronwoodInfo stalled the project long enough for others to jump into the fray. Today, 95% of taxpayers and of those who can read disapprove of the Hovey project. Now, some of the city council supporters have become Born Again, with respect to the project.

With the project stalled and public opinion rising against the project, we were able to do one more thing. The city council finally listened to one of our major complaints about Hovey. There was no sunset clause to the tax free ride. No termination date. The wording accepted by the city council would have left the possibility of this debacle being tax free forever. Now, everyone knows and understands what we knew and reported all along.

 
Let’s be clear about this, Tom Laabs never voted to approve the Hovey Project. In fact, he was the person who called for placing the issue on next Tuesday’s Ballot for the voters to decide.

It was Gemma Lamb who voted against putting it on the ballot .


Tom Laabs, never supported Hovey outright. He did favor the project if the revenues to the city were increased. Tom has been lusting over the $38,000 per year water charges that the complex is predicted to produce. Look again Tom. There’s hanky panky there also. The commission candidates should all walk away from Hovey. Not because of politics but because the project is bad for Ironwood. Interesting enough, the land where the project was to be built was ordered to be sold. Nothing has been done on that score either. Nothing. It is the same group of Unfriendly’$ behind that too!

 

PROPOSED HOVEY TENNIS COURTS
Burchell had a chance to stop Hovey when he was a member of the Planning and Zoning board. He didn’t. In fact, he is the person responsible for adding Tennis Courts to a DNR grant request. The courts in his grant request were to be built on HOVEY PROPERTY with our money!

Once again IronwoodInfo moved to protect the city taxpayers. Our conversation with the DNR raised their attention to the fact that the property on which the $200,000 tennis courts would be built would belong to a private investor.

THE CIVIC CENTER

The Civic Center. This is a non-issue raised by some people to divert attention away from the caves and other pertinent issues. The civic center millage was approved by the voters 3-1 last year. As a result of this action the Civic Center could pay it’s bills and become fiscally sound.

Candidates George Georig and Tom Laabs are both on the Civic Center Board and have made the changes necessary to put the center back in the black.

While we’re on the subject, King Noren, Burchell and Gemma Lamb did everything in their power to kill off the center and keep the millage from getting on the ballot. Gemma Lamb voted twice against keeping the center open for the Polar Bears and Ice Crystals.

It was Tom Laabs and Suzanne Toth who stood fast against the conspiriters and placed the matter on the ballot, thus insuring a home for the Ice Crystals, Polar Bears and other kids to skate during the long, long winters.

If and/or when a Library Tax is imposed on the Ironwood Citizens it will be because of the skullduggery  of Burchell, Noren and Lamb pictured above.
LIBRARY FRIENDS NOT SO FRIENDLY
The Number One Issue this year should be The Tax and Spend Library Renovation. Paying taxes on a Library renovation already voted down by the taxpayers by more than a 2-1 margin is an extremely important matter. It goes directly to the integrity of the not so friendly friend$ of the library.

Two years ago the City Manager, husband of the Librarian, placed the library renovation into the City Improvement Plan without anyone’s permission. But, you can bet he had the approval of "I Wish I Was King Bruce Noren." Fortunately, City Council Member John Kasieta caught the trickery and exposed it at a council meeting. Once more we learned a lot about the issue by using the Freedom of Information Act. Some of the information was so damning we didn’t pursue all of it. We did however, expose most of what we learned to the public which resulted in the landslide defeat of the Tax.

Again, the City manager has attempted to move the Unfriendly Taxation measure through the city council. Fortunately, Congressman Stupak let the cat out of the bag with his press release. Now we can deal directly with those culpable, Gemma Lamb and Bob Burchell. They may be friendly to the library and Hovey but they certainly are not friendly to taxpayers. Too much of their time is being spent on self-serving projects and screw everyone else. How Unfriendly!

Ironwood to Borrow and Tax $1,550,000

Unfriendly Friend$
at it Again

above right- Candidate Bob Burchell and above left fellow unfriendly friend Bruce Noren. On bottom right candidate Gemma Lamb the most unfriendly friend of all.  All three attempted to evict the little Ice Crystals and Polar Bears from the Civic Center. All three supported Hovey Scam. In fact Burchell who now claims to be against Hovey (just in time for the election) originally approved Hovey when he was on the Planning Commission. Burchell and Lamb are now running for re-election on an anti snowmobile and anti-ATV platform. Both have cast negative votes against motor sports and voted to eliminate snowmobiles and atv's  from Ironwood. Other unfriendly candidates in this year's election are: Rick Semo and Ron Taylor. Both Semo and Taylor make it perfectly clear that they are opponents of ATVs and Snowmobiles period! What a great attitude for Ironwood's economy.
Isn't it amazing? A city that can't find the funds to repair the aged water system can borrow millions to renovate a dilapidated library.

And isn't even more amazing that less than two years ago the taxpayers of Ironwood, by a vote of more than 2-1 said no to borrowing millions for the same folly.  This latest action by the Unfriendly Friend$ smells just like that of the Hovey scam!  More to follow, perhaps much more.

Press Release

 
For Immediate Release
October 23, 2009
Contact:  Michelle Begnoche
(202) 225-4735

STUPAK ANNOUNCES $1.6 MILLION

IN STIMULUS FUNDS FOR IRONWOOD

 

WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Congressman Bart Stupak (D-Menominee) announced the city of Ironwood has received a $50,000 grant and a loan for $1,550,000 to renovate and expand the historical Ironwood Carnegie Library.  The U.S. Department of Agriculture is providing the funding through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).  This stimulus funding is designated for community facility projects.

 

“The Carnegie Library is a landmark in Ironwood and this funding will provide upgrades to make the facility safer and more accessible to better serve the community,” Stupak said.  “I applaud this significant investment of stimulus funds in Ironwood.  Support from the USDA is critical to maintaining and improving essential community facilities in rural areas across Northern Michigan.”

 

The stimulus funding will be used to expand access to the library for handicapped and disabled customers; create program, activity, meeting and office spaces; upgrade heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems; and install new windows to improve productivity and efficiency.  At present, none of the local public schools have libraries in their buildings, so maintaining and upgrading this public facility is especially important for the community of Ironwood and the surrounding areas.

 

To date, Gogebic County has received $38,247,739 in ARRA funds, the second highest total in the First Congressional District.

 

The USDA Rural Development Community Facilities program helps finance essential community facilities for public use in rural areas.  These facilities include hospitals, health care and assisted-living facilities, child care center, fire and rescue stations, police stations, community centers, public buildings and transportation.  Funds are available to public bodies, non-profit organizations and federally recognized Indian tribes.

 
Did anyone bother to inform the Congressman that the Taxpayers have already said no to this boondoggle ?
 

Who Said What

above Bergman explaining why he and his group boycotted the meetings.
There is no doubt that the supporters of motorized sports are being more open about the issue of sharing the trail system, all 500+ acres of it. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about some of the non-motorized sports people. The group has been taken over by radicals and more level headed people have been driven from their ranks.

The two groups came close to working out their differences until representatives of the non-motorized sports advocates returned to their group's regular meeting. At that time the loud radicals shouted down the more level minded members and came up with an "ALL OR NOTHING" game plan.

Since then the group including Burchell, Lamb, Taylor and Semo have avoided answering any questions posed to them about their motives.

It is quite simple, answer these two questions individually, without doing the sidestep:

Do you believe that both groups can share the caves area - Yes or No?

Explain?

Yes is just a three letter word, no just two letters, simple enough for any of the candidates to handle. It doesn't require an above average IQ to handle.

"We Didn't Break Off the Talks" (Oh Really?)

That's what Tom Bergman told the City Council, referring to his group's boycott of the Caves Negotiation Meetings.

Oh well, here's the Letter He sent to the city prior to the meeting. See what you think.


DATE: Tuesday, August 4,2009

TO: Scott Erickson, lronwood City Manager
       Dan Petersen, Community Dev. Director

Scott and Dan,

The Friends of the Miners Memorial Heritage Park (FMMHP) held its monthly general membership meeting on Tuesday, July 28, 2009. At this meeting, we discussed the compromises proposed at the meeting the City held on July 8, 2009.

Jackie Powers, Tom Bergman, and Sam Davey attended the July 8th meeting as representatives of the FMMHP, along with eight motorized recreationalists.

Many members of the Friends of Miners Memorial Heritage Park have attended all three of the "discussions about use of the caves" with the City. The FMMHP position follows.

We, the Friends of the Miners Memorial Heritage Park, still believe a
non-motorized park would be best for our community:

A. to make the area most accessible and safe to ALL people in the community,
B. from an economic and neighborhood revitalization perspective, & most importantly,
C. to best honor and celebrate our mining heritage and the thousands of miners who worked this land

We understand how sensitive and complicated an issue this is and appreciate inclusion in the process. However, before meeting yet again with the City and other groups regarding shared usage of said land, the Friends of the Miners Memorial Park request that the City and its Commission first:

1. Complete land title searches so the City and the general public know the property ownership of all of the land in question, per the Resolution passed in February;
2. Confirm what the best use is of the land in question, in accordance with proper planning procedures and the City's Master Plan.
3. Adopt a comprehensive policy for motorized recreational vehicle usage in the City of lronwood (including ATVs, dirt bikes, snowmobiles, etc.) including an enforcement plan.

Sincerely,

Tom Bergman, Vice-President
Friends of the Miners Memorial Heritage Park, lnc.
 
Editor:

First, it is very clear that the group did boycott the meeting. It is equally clear that they do not want motorized sports in the caves. They say just that in this letter.

Second, they were using the title search thing as means to reduce the apparent size of the Caves and park area. Thereby, creating the illusion that the 500+acres were and are too small to share.

Hog wash! New York's Central Park is just 800 acres and each year over 23 million people share the park, including; bikers, hikers and crazy cab drivers!


Tatlor above told committee that he moved to Ironwood to avoid Snowmobiles!
It is quite evident that Mr. Bergman's group has been taken over by radicals who wanted to stall the caves takeover until after the election. They hope to elect the anti-motorized sports candidates, Lamb, Burchell, Semo and Taylor (pictured left).

What started out as a group of recreationalists is now not much more than that of a Political Action Committee.

Proof again that the nicest people can support bad ideas.

 

This is nothing new for Burchell and Lamb who have a history of bad decisions on the City Council, including evicting the little kids who ice skate at the civic center. Stalling the Hovey process. Gema Lamb voted against allowing the voters to decide the issue. Their friends and comrades, the Unfriendly Friend$ of the Library, promoted a bond issue to renovate the library and have sneaked the item by us once again. (We will be reporting on the library scam in detail.)

They are the very reason that there isn't a comprehensive recreational plan in place right now!

If you thought Ironwood's economy had already hit bottom just wait!

 


Signs, Signs, Everywhere There's Signs!

Ironwood - October 29, 2009
I'm old enough to remember the  song Signs - Signs and nearly every election time that song comes to mind. It's hard to ignore with all those political signs staring us in the face, wherever we go. What is surprising that there are still candidates whose signs fail to meet the requirements of the Michigan and local election laws.

Pictured above are the recall signs polluting the Ironwood Township right a ways. These signs are illegal and they are illegally placed along the county roads. A representative from the Road Commission advises that all these signs are on the county right a way and that's illegal. The signs also fail to provide the proper contact information required on the election signs. This is a violation of Michigan Election Laws and we are processing a complaint against the Three Stooges who are blighting our communities. Yes, our communities. Jim Simmons evidently doesn't know where the Township ends. His signs have also been placed along the City of Ironwood's right a ways. No surprise, he doesn't know very much about government, especially his own.

Speaking of missing contact information. The Burchell sign above also lacks contact information. Of course you only need to call the Unfriendly Friend$$$ of the Library for further misinformation and if you do, ask them how they expect Ironwood Taxpayers should pay for their $2,000,000 library renovation. Actually Bob Burchell could tell you as he's one of the organizers for the boondoggle! Hmmmm.

If you have a child that plays Polar Bear Hockey or in the "Ice Crystal" ask Bob where the kids will skate when he and his Unfriendly Friend$$ of the Library close the civic center.

 

A Matter of Clarity

As reported here in IronwoodInfo, James Simmons a township resident, has managed to place a recall petition on the November Ballot. Ever since he lost his bid for a seat on the Board of Trustees, Simmons has been attempting to harass and disrupt the township meetings. His frustration has culminated in an effort to recall Kim Mattson, the Township Supervisor.

Pictured above Kim Mattson at the clarity meeting seated with her supporters - pictured below Simmons and his supporters

In June, as a matter of procedure there was a clarity meeting held in the Gogebic County Courthouse. The meeting consisted of the three members of the committee charged with approving or not approving, Simmons petition.

The committee consisted of Judge Joel Massie, County Clerk Jerry Pelissero and County Treasurer Sue Pertile. Before, during and after the meeting Judge Massie and the County Clerk stated that the purpose of the meeting was to judge only the clarity of the petition statement, not to validate the intent of the petition.

They told the parties at the hearing that they could only rule that Simmons’ was clear to the point that it was clear and could be understood by a voter. The ruling to place the item on the ballot did not validate the integrity of Simmons’ assertions. Judge Massie pointed out that the charges could be a total fabrication, and if the statement was clear and understandable then committee was required to place the item on the ballot.

The fact that Simmons has managed to find enough malcontents to sign his petition and has managed to word it craftily does not make the charges truthful. It’s impossible to turn a lie into anything other than a lie.

A half truth is not the truth it’s a lie. Simmons may be crafty but fortunately he’s not intelligent, nor is the small group of extremists that he surrounds himself with. How intelligent can they be when they must resort to physical violence when things are not going their way.

On the November Ballot you will be reading the lies that Simmons’ has used to harass and otherwise embarrass Kim Mattson. But fortunately, you will also be reading Mattson’s response to the Simmons lies.

We are reproducing the Simmons mis-statement as it will appear on the ballot and Mattson’s repines to each of the misrepresentations.

Simmon’s Lie Number One

During Mattson's first few days in office, she was responsible for a "proposed" draft budget which would have increased her salary by 15% over her predecessor and a 17.5% increase for the Treasurer and Clerk. These wages could have taken effect if not for public outrage.

Mattson’s Rebuttal to Lie Number One

I was not seated in office when the first draft budget was presented. Each department submits their budget to the Supervisor to present. The seven-member board makes the decisions on the proposed budget. As Supervisor, I received a 0% increase from my predecessor. The Clerk and Treasurer received a 3% increase.

Simmons Lie Number Two

Failed to adequately notify the media of special meeting times and dates, including sending false information about the start time on a special meeting held on February 18, 2009.

Mattson’s Rebuttal to Lie Number Two

Notification of meetings is the Clerk's statutory duty. Notices are posted as required by the Open Meetings Act.

Simmons Lie Number Three

Tried to keep information from the public at a meeting on April 13, 2009. Mattson had agenda items listed as "items 1,2, & 3." Called for a vote without publicly discussing the content of those items relating to union pay and benefits. Would not disclose the contents until forced under the Freedom of Information Act days later.

Mattson’s Rebuttal to Lie Number Three

The union negotiation committee presented items 1, 2, & 3 for board approval and the Board approved them. Once approved, the Freedom of Information request was answered in accordance

with the law.

Simmons Lie Number Four

Abused her elected position by using the "power of office" to make false allegations against taxpaying citizens, including calling an employer and causing disruptions in the citizen's respective work environment.

Mattson’s Rebuttal to Lie Number Four

A petition was circulating at a large local employer. The CEO was contacted regarding the petition.

Simmons Lie Number Five

Stated there was a pension contract requiring the township to pay 10% of gross compensation to the full-time officials and employees. A Freedom of Information Act request uncovered no such contract.

Mattson’s Rebuttal to Lie Number Five

Timely responses are given to all Freedom of Information Act requests according to Michigan law. Requests are answered exactly as received.

While Simmons may appear to be a fool, he is not. He is shrewd, cunning and very mean spirited. The charges he placed on the ballot were cleverly prepared so as to trap voters by using their own natural fears to bait their own trap.

He starts off with Mattson’s "salary" as his first statement. Today, when everyone is concerned with taxes and a poor economy he knew that addressing Mattson’s salary he would instantly garner concern and support from unkowledgable voters.

He depended on the ignorance of voters, such as himself, in that they would be totally unaware of the budget process.

As someone who regularly attends township meetings, I know that Mattson had no part in preparing the budget Simmons eludes to. The First draft was prepared by the outgoing board, not the current board.

Simmons states in number two that the media and public were not informed as to the dates and times of the meetings.

The Supervisor (Mattson) is not responsible for posting the dates and times of the meetings. It is the responsibility of the Township Clerk. The problem, was that Simmons himself was unaware of the meeting times. After all, prior to losing the election he didn’t attend township meetings and he was totally ignorant as to procedures. If the meetings had not been properly posted why was everyone else at the meeting except him.

Simmons refers to the Freedom of Information Act in two of the five items he has placed on the ballot. Simmons accuses Mattson of having to be forced into giving him information. I have seen Kim Mattson on several occasions offer to give Simmons the information he has asked for after the meeting. Unfortunately, Simmons would use the time after the meetings to suck up to the Globe reporters. Like Simmons, the Globe Reporters were absent from the township meetings for many years. They show up regularly now sensing that there is muck to rake.

Item number four is fairly ambiguous and was the one item that almost failed the clarity review. He uses terminology such as "power of her office" to scam the voter. Whatever it is that he is trying to say in number four will never be understood by anyone but him. If that’s the best he could do shame on him.